Radiocarbon dating controversy

In fact, I believe that the evidence does not permit the long ages given by radiometric dates, so there must be a problem with them somewhere, even on scientific grounds.

Just the fact that there are so many fossils shows that the great sedimentary deposits on earth had to have formed rapidly, because well-preserved fossils do not form under conditions of gradual sedimentation. How can we explain the fact that these dating methods do, in fact, yield dates in the hundreds of millions of years?It has been a struggle for me to try to understand the evidences and to learn enough about them to find the answers to these questions.I was initially involved in some internet discussions where the subject of radiometric dating was brought up, and the arguments in favor of life existing for millions of years seemed almost overpowering.We need to pray that the Lord will give spirit-led scientists the knowledge they need to deal with this subject, so that the truth will be revealed, because the conflict is beyond human wisdom.This area is a key support for the theory of evolution, which is undermining Christian values all over the world.

radiocarbon dating controversy-22radiocarbon dating controversy-41radiocarbon dating controversy-80

This book, by Dickin, written in 1995, is another popular textbook.

Join our conversation (24 Comments).
Click Here To Leave Your Comment Radiocarbon dating controversy.

Comments:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *